CM/GC Spanish Fork Public Works Facility
Federal opportunity from CITIES • City of Spanish Fork. Place of performance: UT. Response deadline: Mar 10, 2026.
Support routes that fit this solicitation
Market snapshot
Baseline awarded-market signal across all contracting (sample of 400 recent awards; refreshed periodically).
Related hubs & trends
Navigate the lattice: hubs for browsing, trends for pricing signals.
Applicable Wage Determinations
SAM WDOL references matched to this opportunity's location and scope language.
View more for this contract3 more WD matches and 49 more rate previews.↓
Point of Contact
Agency & Office
Description
CM/GC Spanish Fork Public Works Facility
Files
Files size/type shown when available.
BidPulsar Analysis
A practical, capture-style breakdown of fit, requirements, risks, and next steps.
This notice is for a CM/GC delivery procurement titled “CM/GC Spanish Fork Public Works Facility” issued by an agency listed as CITIES. The only scope detail provided is the project name/asset: a Public Works Facility in Spanish Fork, implying a vertical facilities project procured via Construction Manager/General Contractor. The response deadline is 2026-03-10T22:00:00+00:00. With no attachments, solicitation number, or scope narrative provided, bidders should treat this as an early capture signal and quickly confirm the full RFP/RFQ package location and requirements before committing bid resources.
Select a CM/GC partner for the Spanish Fork Public Works Facility project, likely to provide preconstruction services and then negotiate/execute construction under a CM/GC model.
- Regional/general contractors with demonstrated CM/GC delivery experience on municipal/public facilities
- Firms with prior Public Works or municipal operations facility experience (maintenance shops, fleet, yards, admin spaces) that can be mapped to “Public Works Facility”
- CM/GC procurement response for the Spanish Fork Public Works Facility (qualifications and/or technical approach aligned to CM/GC delivery)
- Preconstruction planning and constructability support (typical CM/GC expectation; confirm in solicitation)
- Construction phase delivery as the General Contractor under CM/GC (confirm contract structure and GMP/fee approach in solicitation)
- Confirm the official solicitation/RFP/RFQ package location (buyer website or portal not provided in the notice brief)
- Prepare a CM/GC-focused qualifications narrative tied to the Spanish Fork Public Works Facility
- Project team/organization chart and key personnel resumes relevant to CM/GC delivery
- Relevant past performance for municipal/public facilities and CM/GC projects
- Schedule approach and preconstruction deliverables approach (as required by the solicitation once obtained)
- Any required forms/certifications once the full solicitation is located (not provided in brief)
More BidPulsar strategy notesCompliance, pricing, teaming, risks, questions, and coverage notes
- Response deadline: 2026-03-10T22:00:00+00:00
- No solicitation number, attachments, or portal/link provided in the brief—compliance requirements cannot be validated until the full solicitation is retrieved
- CM/GC procurements commonly evaluate preconstruction fee, GC fee, general conditions, and/or approach to GMP development—confirm exact pricing structure and evaluation criteria in the full solicitation before finalizing strategy
- Given the limited notice detail, avoid committing to any fee structure until the official RFP/RFQ requirements and pricing forms are reviewed
- Consider early teaming with specialty subs relevant to a Public Works Facility (e.g., MEP trades, site/civil) to strengthen constructability and cost/schedule credibility—only after scope/program is confirmed in the solicitation
- If lacking municipal CM/GC references, consider teaming/joint venturing with a partner that has strong CM/GC public facility past performance (verify permissibility in solicitation)
- Insufficient scope detail in the notice brief increases risk of misaligned proposal content until the full solicitation is obtained
- Unknown submission method (portal/email/physical) and required forms could create a last-minute compliance failure if not identified immediately
- Place of performance is not specified beyond the project name; site constraints and local requirements are unknown from the brief
- Where is the official CM/GC solicitation package for “CM/GC Spanish Fork Public Works Facility” posted (link/portal), and what is the solicitation number?
- Is this an RFQ-only selection, or an RFP with pricing components (precon fee/GC fee/GCs) at the time of submission?
- What are the anticipated key milestones for preconstruction, GMP development, and construction (not provided in the brief)?
- What are the evaluation factors and their weights for the CM/GC selection?
- Are there any mandatory pre-proposal meetings, site visits, or Q&A deadlines?
Some notices publish limited source detail. Confirm these points before final bid/no-bid decisions.
- Link/portal to the full solicitation and any attachments
- Solicitation number and notice type (RFQ vs RFP)
- Detailed scope/program, size, and site/location specifics for the Public Works Facility
- Contract structure details (GMP timing, fee forms, preconstruction scope)
- Evaluation criteria and required submission contents/forms
- Any mandatory meetings, Q&A deadlines, and submission instructions
FAQ
How do I use the Market Snapshot?
It summarizes awarded-contract behavior for the opportunity’s NAICS and sector, including a recent pricing band (P10–P90), momentum, and composition. Use it as context, not a guarantee.
Is the data live?
The signal updates as new awarded notices enter the system. Always validate the official award and solicitation details on SAM.gov.
What do P10 and P90 mean?
P10 is the 10th percentile award size and P90 is the 90th percentile. Together they describe the typical spread of award values.