RFP No. 245132 Rebid of Automated Agenda Management Solution
Federal opportunity from City of Salem. Place of performance: OR. Response deadline: May 23, 2025.
Market snapshot
Baseline awarded-market signal across all contracting (sample of 400 recent awards; refreshed periodically).
Related hubs & trends
Navigate the lattice: hubs for browsing, trends for pricing signals.
Applicable Wage Determinations
SAM WDOL references matched to this opportunity's location and scope language.
View more for this contract3 more WD matches and 46 more rate previews.↓
Point of Contact
Agency & Office
Description
RFP No. 245132 Rebid of Automated Agenda Management Solution
Files
Files size/type shown when available.
BidPulsar Analysis
A practical, capture-style breakdown of fit, requirements, risks, and next steps.
The City of Salem has issued RFP No. 245132 for the rebid of an Automated Agenda Management Solution. This opportunity is significant due to its potential impact on the efficiency of city governance processes. Bidders must also prepare to submit their proposals by May 23, 2025, to be considered for this project.
The buyer aims to enhance their municipal agenda management processes through the implementation of an automated solution.
- Companies with experience in developing automated agenda management solutions
- Vendors offering user-friendly software for municipal governance
- Consultants with expertise in local government operations
- Evaluate current agenda management processes
- Develop requirements for the automated solution
- Implement the selected automated agenda management software
- Provide training and support for city staff
- Proposal submission by May 23, 2025
- Detailed project plan and timeline
- Pricing breakdown
- References from similar projects
- Technical specifications of the proposed solution
More BidPulsar strategy notesCompliance, pricing, teaming, risks, questions, and coverage notes
- Ensure compliance with local government procurement regulations
- Meet data security and privacy standards outlined by the city
- Consider a pricing structure that includes licensing, implementation, and ongoing support fees
- Competitive pricing is crucial as multiple vendors may bid
- Potential to partner with established software vendors
- Subcontracting for training and support services could be effective
- Risk of underestimating the complexity of integration with existing city systems
- Potential for scope creep if requirements change during the process
- What are the specific pain points with the current agenda management system?
- What is the budget allocated for this project?
- Are there specific compliance standards that must be met?
Some notices publish limited source detail. Confirm these points before final bid/no-bid decisions.
- No posted date available
- Lack of specific technical requirements
- Absence of current solution details
- No information on the evaluation criteria
- Unclear budget range for the project
- No information on previous RFP submissions
- Missing city staff points of contact
- Absence of resource links for further details
FAQ
How do I use the Market Snapshot?
It summarizes awarded-contract behavior for the opportunity’s NAICS and sector, including a recent pricing band (P10–P90), momentum, and composition. Use it as context, not a guarantee.
Is the data live?
The signal updates as new awarded notices enter the system. Always validate the official award and solicitation details on SAM.gov.
What do P10 and P90 mean?
P10 is the 10th percentile award size and P90 is the 90th percentile. Together they describe the typical spread of award values.