Skip to content
← Back to blog

Set-Aside Pulse: DOD & USDA small-business buys (mirrors, brackets, valves, packing materials, rentals, and a lab instrument)

Feb 07, 2026Taylor NguyenCapture Strategy Analyst4 min readset aside pulse
small business set-asideDLANSN partsRFQIDIQ/IDCUSMCArmyUSDA Forest Service
Opportunity snapshot
25--MIRROR ASSEMBLY,REA
DEPT OF DEFENSEDEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCYSet-aside: SBANAICS: 336360PSC: 25
Posted
2026-02-06
Due
2026-02-18T00:00:00+00:00

Related opportunities

Executive takeaway

This batch is dominated by DLA supply buys under SBA set-asides, with multiple RFQs requiring electronic quotes and (in some cases) no drawings/specs available in the notice. The standout for recurring revenue is the mirror assembly requirement that may result in an automated IDC (one-year term or until an aggregate order ceiling is reached), but it is also the most sensitive to approved source constraints. If you’re not already an approved source (or able to quote an approved source item), prioritize the valve with a stated complete technical data package and government data rights.

What the buyer is trying to do

Across these notices, buyers are trying to quickly secure supply-chain continuity for specific items identified by NSN/part lineage and deliver them into DLA distribution (including shipments that may route through consolidation/containerization points for OCONUS). The acquisition style is transactional: RFQs, electronic submission, and short-turn evaluation focused on compliance and delivery.

The opportunities covered here:

What work is implied

  • RFQ response preparation and electronic submission for each notice (several explicitly state quotes must be submitted electronically).
  • NSN/part compliance confirmation and buy-to-print/buy-to-source execution (depending on whether drawings/specs are available).
  • Source eligibility validation where “approved sources” are listed (e.g., mirror assembly).
  • Delivery planning to DLA distribution sites; for the mirror assembly, shipments may go to various CONUS and OCONUS locations via consolidation/containerization points.
  • Schedule commitment against stated ADO delivery timelines (e.g., 79 days ADO for mirror assemblies; 114 days ADO for mounting brackets; 167 days ADO for one valve requirement).
  • For the TDP-based valve buy, capability to manufacture/comply to a technical data package (TDP ver 002) and ship split quantities to multiple DLA distribution locations.
  • For MIL-PRF material, ability to supply packaging/separator sheet materials in accordance with MIL-PRF-50449.
  • For the USMC utility vehicle requirement, likely rental/lease delivery and support aligned to NAICS 532120 (verify exact scope in the solicitation).
  • For the USDA instrument notice, clarification of what “Fixed Price is not competitive” means for eligibility and response approach (verify in attachments/notice details).

Who should bid / who should pass

  • Bid if you are an approved source (or can supply an approved source item) for the mirror assembly RFQ and you want an opportunity that may convert into an automated IDC ordering stream.
  • Bid if you have experience with DLA RFQs, ADO delivery commitments, and shipping to DLA distribution locations (including split shipments).
  • Bid if you can work from government-controlled technical data: the “VALVE, 16 IN” notice states the government has rights to the technical data and the data package is complete.
  • Bid if you can provide MIL-PRF compliant packaging/separator materials (MIL-PRF-50449) with fast turnaround.
  • Pass if you cannot meet approved-source constraints (mirror assembly) and the solicitation does not provide an alternate path (verify in the RFQ).
  • Pass if your shop cannot reliably hit the stated ADO timelines once you factor in inspection, packaging, and DLA delivery logistics.
  • Pass if you rely on drawings/specs being included and the notice explicitly says specifications/plans/drawings are not available (mirror assembly), unless you already control the design or are quoting an approved source item.

Response package checklist

  • Completed RFQ response per solicitation instructions (verify in attachments).
  • Confirmation of electronic quote submission method and formatting requirements (explicitly required in multiple notices; verify portal/process in the RFQ).
  • Item compliance documentation:
    • NSN and line item mapping (quantity, unit of issue, and delivery locations/dates).
    • Approved source evidence where applicable (mirror assembly lists approved sources).
    • For TDP-driven items, confirmation you can comply with the referenced TDP version (verify access details in the solicitation).
    • For MIL-PRF-50449 materials, certification/statement of compliance (verify required form in attachments).
  • Delivery schedule commitment aligned to ADO requirements stated in the notice.
  • Packaging and shipping approach for DLA distribution (including split shipments when required; verify packaging/shipping clauses in the RFQ).
  • Representations/certifications appropriate to the set-aside (verify clauses in the solicitation).

Pricing & strategy notes

These are largely supply RFQs, so pricing tends to win when you reduce uncertainty: validated sources, clear delivery, and low administrative friction.

  • Mirror assembly (possible automated IDC): research prior buys and ordering patterns by looking for historical NSN demand and prior contract actions for NSN 2540-01-479-4144. The notice mentions an estimated number of orders per year and a guaranteed minimum quantity—treat those as demand signals, but price as if actual ordering could vary.
  • “VALVE, 16 IN” with TDP: since the notice states the government has rights and the TDP is complete, your strategy should focus on manufacturability, lead time drivers, and any testing/inspection requirements described in the solicitation. Validate you can meet the split-ship delivery locations.
  • Other DLA RFQs (bracket/valve exhaust control): the notice indicates digitized drawings and military specs/standards may be retrievable electronically. Before final pricing, pull the referenced specs/standards (where available) and confirm any special process requirements that could change cost.
  • General research: benchmark against recent awards for the same NSN/PSC where you have access, and sanity-check raw material/lead-time exposure against the ADO delivery requirement.

Subcontracting / teaming ideas

  • Partner with an established approved source (or authorized distributor) for the mirror assembly requirement if you’re not currently approved but can add value via logistics, packaging, or contract administration.
  • Team with a machine shop or valve specialist familiar with TDP-based manufacturing to reduce risk on the “VALVE, 16 IN” buy (verify TDP access and any qualification requirements in the solicitation).
  • Use a logistics/3PL partner experienced with DLA distribution shipping and OCONUS consolidation/containerization routing (mirror assembly notice references that pathway).
  • For MIL-PRF-50449 separator materials, consider teaming with a packaging materials manufacturer that already produces to MIL-PRF requirements, while you handle quoting and delivery execution.

Risks & watch-outs

  • Approved source restrictions can effectively limit competition even when “all responsible sources may submit a quote” is stated—mirror assembly lists approved sources.
  • No drawings/specs available (mirror assembly notice) increases performance risk unless you are already producing the exact item or quoting an approved source item.
  • ADO delivery timelines are tight enough that supplier lead times and inspection can sink your schedule if you don’t validate them up front.
  • IDC language (mirror assembly) introduces volume uncertainty: term is one year or until an aggregate total ceiling is reached, with a guaranteed minimum quantity. Ensure your pricing and inventory assumptions tolerate variability.
  • Document retrieval dependencies: some notices indicate drawings/specs may be retrieved electronically; confirm access and completeness before committing to price.
  • USDA notice ambiguity: “Fixed Price is not competitive” is a red flag for bid/no-bid until you confirm the intent and allowable responses.

Related opportunities

How to act on this

  1. Open each BidPulsar notice link and download the RFQ/solicitation (hard copies are not available for several of these).
  2. For each NSN item, validate: approved source status (if applicable), drawings/spec availability, and your ability to meet the ADO delivery requirement.
  3. Build a compliance-first quote package and submit electronically per the RFQ instructions (verify exact method in attachments).
  4. If you want hands-on capture support—source validation, compliance review, and quote strategy—engage Federal Bid Partners LLC.

Related posts