Skip to content
← Back to blog

Set-Aside Pulse: DLA RFQs for single-quantity NSN parts plus a fast-turn NAVSEA transducer RFQ

Jan 22, 2026Taylor NguyenCapture Strategy Analyst4 min readset aside pulse
DLANAVSEARFQNSNSBA Set-Asidesparesdistribution
Opportunity snapshot
61--INVERTER
DEPT OF DEFENSEDEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCYSet-aside: SBANAICS: 335312PSC: 61
Posted
2026-01-21
Due
2026-02-02T00:00:00+00:00

Related opportunities

Executive takeaway

This pulse is dominated by Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) RFQs for single-quantity NSN items where the notice explicitly says specs/drawings aren’t available and “approved sources” are identified. That usually signals a brand/part-controlled supply action where the fastest path to award is quoting as an approved source (or an authorized channel that can provide the exact approved part). Also included is a NAVSEA Warfare Center Newport RFQ for a Honeywell Super TJE Pressure Transducer with details in an attachment and an HHS FOH clinical staffing notice with no public description in the snippet—likely requiring attachment review before investing capture time.

What the buyer is trying to do

Across the DLA items, the buyer is replenishing/issuing specific repair parts to support distribution points and a deployed platform, using NSN-based procurement with identified approved sources and electronic quote submission. The intent appears to be straightforward fulfillment of exact items (not development) on tight administrative timelines.

For NAVSEA Newport, the buyer is seeking a specific pressure transducer (Honeywell Super TJE), with all requirements contained in the RFQ attachment.

What work is implied (bullets)

  • Quote and furnish the exact NSN item(s) requested, typically at quantity 1 each, in accordance with the RFQ.
  • Source control compliance where “approved source” cage codes and part numbers are specified (e.g., inverter, heating element, industrial fluid cooler).
  • Meet delivery timelines stated in the notice (e.g., “By: 0005 DAYS ADO” for the inverter to USS MAKIN ISLAND; “By: 0167 DAYS ADO” for some DLA distribution deliveries).
  • Electronic submission of quotes (the DLA notices specify that quotes must be submitted electronically; hard copies not available).
  • For the NAVSEA transducer: review the attached RFQ and comply with any brand/model, documentation, and delivery instructions contained there (verify in attachments).

Who should bid / who should pass (bullets)

  • Bid if: you are an approved source listed in the notice (matching cage/part number) or you can supply the exact approved part with traceability that will satisfy the RFQ.
  • Bid if: you can execute small-quantity, high-accuracy fulfillment and handle electronic RFQ response processes efficiently.
  • Bid if: you can meet the required ship-to locations and the specified ADO delivery windows.
  • Pass if: you need drawings/specs to manufacture or reverse engineer—these notices explicitly state specifications, plans, or drawings are not available for the DLA items.
  • Pass if: you cannot meet the “approved source” restriction (or cannot document equivalency/acceptability per the RFQ terms—verify in attachments).
  • Pass if: you cannot turn a response quickly (notably the NAVSEA RFQ closes sooner than the DLA items listed).

Response package checklist (bullets; if unknown say “verify in attachments”)

  • Completed electronic quote submission per the RFQ instructions (portal/email method and format: verify in the solicitation).
  • NSN and line item mapping for each quoted item; unit of issue (EA) and quantity alignment.
  • Manufacturer cage code and the specific approved part number(s) referenced in the notice (where applicable).
  • Delivery promise consistent with the stated ADO requirement and ship-to location (e.g., DLA Distribution sites; USS MAKIN ISLAND for the inverter).
  • Traceability/authorization documentation if quoting as a distributor/reseller (requirements: verify in attachments/solicitation).
  • For NAVSEA Newport transducer: all required RFQ representations, technical compliance statements, and any required data items (verify in attachments).

Pricing & strategy notes (how to research pricing; do not invent pricing numbers)

  • Use the NSN and the listed approved part numbers to benchmark prior buys and market availability. For DLA items, also search by cage/part combinations called out in the notice.
  • Validate lead time risk before quoting aggressive delivery—ADO windows can drive expedite costs. Price should reflect realistic sourcing and shipment plans.
  • Where “approved sources” are named, expect evaluation to be heavily compliance-driven. If you are not the OEM, emphasize your ability to deliver the exact approved part and any required traceability (requirements: verify in solicitation).
  • For the NAVSEA transducer, treat the attachment as the source of truth; pricing approach should reflect any acceptance testing, calibration/documentation, or packaging requirements described there (verify in attachments).

Subcontracting / teaming ideas (bullets)

  • Partner with an authorized OEM distributor channel for the listed approved-source parts to satisfy source restrictions while keeping your quoting entity eligible under the set-aside.
  • Use a specialty logistics partner for time-sensitive shipboard delivery (e.g., the inverter delivery to USS MAKIN ISLAND) to reduce schedule risk.
  • For the NAVSEA transducer, consider teaming with a supplier that routinely supports Navy test/instrumentation components if the RFQ requires documentation or special handling (verify in attachments).

Risks & watch-outs (bullets)

  • Source control risk: DLA notices identify “approved sources,” and they also state drawings/specs aren’t available—non-approved alternates may be rejected unless the RFQ explicitly allows them (verify in solicitation).
  • Schedule risk: very short ADO window for the inverter (“0005 DAYS ADO”)—confirm you can truly meet it before quoting.
  • Information risk: multiple notices provide minimal description beyond NSN and sourcing notes; the actual RFQ/attachments will control.
  • Submission risk: electronic-only quotes; ensure you can access the RFQ at the provided link and comply with exact formatting and timing.
  • Unknown-scope risk: the FOH Clinical West Staffing notice has no description in the snippet; do not assume staffing categories, locations, or credentialing requirements without attachments.

Related opportunities

How to act on this

  1. Open each notice link and download the RFQ/attachments; confirm all requirements and submission instructions.
  2. Confirm you can meet the exact approved source/part requirements (or that the RFQ allows your proposed source).
  3. Validate delivery feasibility against the stated ADO timelines and ship-to locations.
  4. Prepare a compliant electronic quote package and submit ahead of the response deadline.

If you want a second set of eyes on source-control positioning and quote compliance, contact Federal Bid Partners LLC to review your response strategy before submission.

Related posts