Best fit for this contractDavis-Bacon
UT20260025 (Rev 0)Match signal: state matchOpen WD
Published Jan 02, 2026Utah • Daggett
Rate
Base $32.14Fringe $14.65
Rate
Base $29.62Fringe $14.65
+35 more occupation rates available in the full WD.
Salt Lake City Corporation Request for Proposals SLCI26080 Privacy Consulting Services
Solicitation: Not available
Notice ID: ut-u3p-222768
Department • Salt Lake City CorporationAgency • CitiesState • UTPosted • —Due • Feb 26, 2026, 10:00 PM UTC• Expired
Federal opportunity from CITIES • Salt Lake City Corporation. Place of performance: UT. Response deadline: Feb 26, 2026.
Market snapshot
Baseline awarded-market signal across all contracting (sample of 400 recent awards; refreshed periodically).
12-month awarded value
$7,205,695,420
Sector total $7,205,695,420 • Share 100.0%
Live
Median
$96,720
P10–P90
$28,298–$2,037,759
Volatility
Volatile200%
Market composition
NAICS share of sector
A simple concentration signal, not a forecast.
100.0%
share
Momentum (last 3 vs prior 3 buckets)
+100%($7,205,695,420)
Deal sizing
$96,720 median
Use as a pricing centerline.
Live signal is computed from awarded notices already observed in the system.
Signals shown are descriptive of observed awards; not a forecast.
Related hubs & trends
Navigate the lattice: hubs for browsing, trends for pricing signals.
Live POP
Place of performance
Utah
Contracting office
Not listed
Applicable Wage Determinations
SAM WDOL references matched to this opportunity's location and scope language.
View more for this contract3 more WD matches and 35 more rate previews.↓
View more for this contract
3 more WD matches and 35 more rate previews.
Davis-BaconBest fitstate match
UT20260025 (Rev 0)Published Jan 02, 2026Utah • Daggett
Rate
Base $32.14Fringe $14.65
Rate
Base $29.62Fringe $14.65
Rate
Base $29.37Fringe $14.65
+34 more occupation rates in this WD
Davis-Baconstate match
UT20260104 (Rev 0)Published Jan 02, 2026Utah • Box Elder
Rate
Base $22.84Fringe $4.64
Rate
Base $21.19Fringe $6.82
Rate
Base $32.24Fringe $7.85
+31 more occupation rates in this WD
Davis-Baconstate match
UT20260086 (Rev 0)Published Jan 02, 2026Utah • Tooele
Rate
Base $31.66Fringe $13.97
Rate
Base $55.43Fringe $38.43
Rate
Base $26.00Fringe $8.78
+23 more occupation rates in this WD
Davis-Baconstate match
UT20260072 (Rev 0)Published Jan 02, 2026Utah • Grand
Rate
Base $44.37Fringe $26.87
Rate
Base $42.17Fringe $26.63
Rate
Base $46.79Fringe $14.89
+15 more occupation rates in this WD
Point of Contact
Not available
Agency & Office
Department
Salt Lake City Corporation
Agency
CITIES
Subagency
CITIES
Office
Not available
Contracting Office Address
Not available
Description
Salt Lake City Corporation Request for Proposals SLCI26080 Privacy Consulting Services
Files
Files size/type shown when available.
No public attachments surfaced yet. Some owner portals gate files behind registration, and BidPulsar keeps enriching the package as new public links appear.
BidPulsar Analysis
A practical, capture-style breakdown of fit, requirements, risks, and next steps.
Updated: Feb 21, 2026
Client-ready brief
Executive summary
medium confidencegpt 4o mini
The Salt Lake City Corporation has issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Privacy Consulting Services, identified by RFP number SLCI26080. This opportunity is intended to enhance privacy frameworks within the city. Proposals are due by February 26, 2026, and potential bidders should ensure compliance with privacy regulations pertinent to local government operations.
Privacy ConsultingMunicipal Privacy ServicesPrivacy ComplianceRFP Salt Lake CityCity Government Privacy
What the buyer is trying to do
Salt Lake City Corporation aims to secure a qualified vendor to provide consulting services focused on improving privacy protocols and compliance within the municipal framework.
Who should pursue this
- Firms with experience in privacy consulting
- Companies with knowledge of municipal regulations
- Consultants with a track record of working with government entities
Work breakdown
- Assess current privacy policies
- Develop recommendations for policy enhancements
- Provide training for city staff on privacy best practices
- Create a compliance monitoring framework
- Conduct a privacy impact assessment on city projects
Response package checklist
- Executive summary of capabilities
- Detailed project approach
- Resumes of key personnel
- References from similar projects
- Proposed pricing structure
More BidPulsar strategy notesCompliance, pricing, teaming, risks, questions, and coverage notes
Compliance notes
- Must adhere to local and national privacy regulations
- Experience with city government compliance standards is essential
Pricing strategy
- Pricing should be competitive and reflect the complexity of the services offered
- Consider a tiered pricing strategy based on scope of work proposed
Teaming and subs
- Consider partnering with technology firms specializing in privacy solutions
- Look for local firms with experience in city government for collaboration
Risks and watchouts
- Potential for tight competition from well-established privacy consulting firms
- Compliance risks if regulations change before contract execution
- Budget constraints may influence the selection process
Smart questions to ask
- What specific privacy challenges does the city currently face?
- What timeline does the city envision for implementing recommendations?
- Are there existing policies that the city would like to maintain or enhance?
Source coverage notes
Some notices publish limited source detail. Confirm these points before final bid/no-bid decisions.
- No specific scope of work details
- Agency budget allocation for this RFP is unclear
- No information on evaluation criteria or weighting
- No prior contract performance history provided
- Local regulations that influence this RFP are not outlined
- Duration of consulting engagement is unspecified
- No attached resources or documents
- Potential subcontracting opportunities not defined
FAQ
How do I use the Market Snapshot?
It summarizes awarded-contract behavior for the opportunity’s NAICS and sector, including a recent pricing band (P10–P90), momentum, and composition. Use it as context, not a guarantee.
Is the data live?
The signal updates as new awarded notices enter the system. Always validate the official award and solicitation details on SAM.gov.
What do P10 and P90 mean?
P10 is the 10th percentile award size and P90 is the 90th percentile. Together they describe the typical spread of award values.