BB26-18, Healthcare Facilities Data Contractor
Federal opportunity from Division of Purchasing. Place of performance: UT. Response deadline: Mar 02, 2026.
Market snapshot
Baseline awarded-market signal across all contracting (sample of 400 recent awards; refreshed periodically).
Related hubs & trends
Navigate the lattice: hubs for browsing, trends for pricing signals.
Applicable Wage Determinations
SAM WDOL references matched to this opportunity's location and scope language.
View more for this contract3 more WD matches and 35 more rate previews.↓
Point of Contact
Agency & Office
Description
BB26-18, Healthcare Facilities Data Contractor
Files
Files size/type shown when available.
BidPulsar Analysis
A practical, capture-style breakdown of fit, requirements, risks, and next steps.
This notice (ut-u3p-222402) is titled “BB26-18, Healthcare Facilities Data Contractor” and is issued by the Division of Purchasing. The brief provides only the title-level scope, with no statement of work details, deliverables, or data standards specified. The response deadline is 2026-03-02 16:00 UTC, so a quick clarification cycle is critical before committing bid resources. Given the limited detail, bid/no-bid should hinge on immediately confirming the expected data sources, update cadence, and compliance obligations tied to healthcare facilities data.
Engage a contractor to provide and/or manage “Healthcare Facilities Data” for BB26-18, likely involving collection, validation, maintenance, and delivery of a facilities dataset or data services for healthcare facilities, under a procurement run by the Division of Purchasing.
- Firms with demonstrable experience building/maintaining healthcare facility datasets (facility master data, provider directories, facility registries)
- Data engineering and data governance vendors capable of QA, normalization, and recurring refresh operations
- Organizations with established data stewardship processes and auditable data lineage practices
- Confirm scope definition for “Healthcare Facilities Data” (dataset vs. ongoing services)
- Identify healthcare facility entities covered (e.g., hospitals, clinics, long-term care) and required attributes
- Data acquisition/ingestion from authoritative sources (as specified by buyer)
- Data quality management: validation, deduplication, normalization, change tracking
- Ongoing updates/refresh cadence and version control
- Data delivery mechanism (files, API, portal) and documentation (data dictionary, metadata)
- Support services: issue resolution, stakeholder communications, reporting (if required)
- Security/privacy/compliance handling for any sensitive elements (as defined in solicitation)
- Completed response addressing BB26-18, Healthcare Facilities Data Contractor (ut-u3p-222402)
- Technical approach describing how healthcare facilities data will be sourced, validated, and maintained
- Data quality plan (validation rules, exception handling, accuracy/completeness metrics)
- Sample deliverables (example dataset extract, data dictionary/metadata example) if allowed
- Project staffing plan identifying data roles (data engineer, data steward/QA lead, PM)
- Past performance examples specific to healthcare facilities data or similar master data programs
- Implementation and transition plan (initial build + steady-state refresh operations)
More BidPulsar strategy notesCompliance, pricing, teaming, risks, questions, and coverage notes
- No compliance requirements are provided in the brief; confirm whether healthcare-related data privacy/security requirements apply and whether any state-specific standards are mandated in the full solicitation.
- No pricing structure is provided in the brief; confirm whether the buyer expects firm-fixed-price for a dataset, subscription-style pricing for ongoing updates, or time-and-materials for data operations services.
- If ongoing data maintenance is required, consider separating one-time onboarding/initial build from recurring refresh and support (pending solicitation allowance).
- Consider teaming with a healthcare data source/provider (if permitted/needed) and a specialist data quality/MDM partner for validation and governance workflows.
- If API delivery or hosting is required, consider a subcontractor for secure data platform hosting/operations (only if the solicitation requires delivery as a service).
- Extremely limited scope detail in the notice text (“BB26-18, Healthcare Facilities Data Contractor”) creates high bid-shaping risk until the full solicitation/SOW is reviewed.
- Potential for hidden compliance obligations (privacy/security, data licensing restrictions) not visible in the brief.
- Tight turnaround to deadline (2026-03-02 16:00 UTC) once full requirements are known may compress solution design and subcontractor commitments.
- Unclear definition of ‘facility’ and authoritative sources may drive significant rework if assumptions are wrong.
- Can you provide the full solicitation package for BB26-18 and confirm required deliverables (dataset, API, reports, dashboards, or managed service)?
- Which healthcare facility types are in scope, and what minimum required data fields/attributes must be delivered?
- What are the authoritative sources and licensing expectations—must the contractor procure/own licenses, or will sources be provided?
- What update cadence is required (real-time, monthly, quarterly), and are historical versions/change logs required?
- What data quality targets are required (accuracy, completeness, timeliness), and how will they be measured/accepted?
- What delivery format is required (CSV, database export, API), and are there required schemas or data standards?
- Are there security/privacy requirements applicable to the data (even if de-identified), and what are the hosting/handling constraints?
- What is the anticipated period of performance and expected volume/coverage (statewide, regional, national)?
Some notices publish limited source detail. Confirm these points before final bid/no-bid decisions.
- Full solicitation/SOW and any attachments
- PSC/NAICS and set-aside details
- Place of performance and any geographic coverage requirements
- Period of performance (start/end)
- Required deliverables and delivery method (files/API/portal)
- Data sources, licensing expectations, and ownership/usage rights
- Data fields/standards/schema and acceptance criteria
- Security/privacy/compliance requirements
FAQ
How do I use the Market Snapshot?
It summarizes awarded-contract behavior for the opportunity’s NAICS and sector, including a recent pricing band (P10–P90), momentum, and composition. Use it as context, not a guarantee.
Is the data live?
The signal updates as new awarded notices enter the system. Always validate the official award and solicitation details on SAM.gov.
What do P10 and P90 mean?
P10 is the 10th percentile award size and P90 is the 90th percentile. Together they describe the typical spread of award values.