Vendor Risk Management Software - UPDATED
Federal opportunity from Central Procurement Office • Tennessee Department of General Services. Place of performance: TN.
Market snapshot
Baseline awarded-market signal across all contracting (sample of 400 recent awards; refreshed periodically).
Related hubs & trends
Navigate the lattice: hubs for browsing, trends for pricing signals.
Applicable Wage Determinations
SAM WDOL references matched to this opportunity's location and scope language.
View more for this contract3 more WD matches and 11 more rate previews.↓
Point of Contact
Agency & Office
Description
Vendor Risk Management Software - UPDATED
Files
Files size/type shown when available.
BidPulsar Analysis
A practical, capture-style breakdown of fit, requirements, risks, and next steps.
The State of Tennessee is seeking information on vendor risk management software to manage third-party risks comprehensively. With a response deadline set for January 8, 2026, the RFI outlines a requirement for solutions supporting vendor onboarding, assessment, monitoring, and compliance. This initiative aims to align with operational and regulatory standards across multiple state agencies.
The buyer aims to gather information on vendor risk management solutions that support the entire lifecycle of vendor risk management, including onboarding, risk assessments, continuous monitoring, and compliance management.
- Software providers with experience in vendor risk management solutions
- Companies that offer customizable and scalable platforms
- Firms with demonstrated compliance with security policies regarding data handling
- Vendor onboarding and due diligence functionalities
- Risk assessment and scoring mechanisms
- Continuous monitoring capabilities
- Contract and SLA management tools
- Workflow automation features
- Regulatory compliance mapping
- Reporting and dashboard customization
- Integration capabilities with existing systems
- Vendor offboarding processes
- Comprehensive response detailing software functionalities
- Technical architecture outline
- Integration capabilities information
- Pricing models and support services details
- Response to each business requirement in Table 3.1
More BidPulsar strategy notesCompliance, pricing, teaming, risks, questions, and coverage notes
- All state data must remain in the U.S.
- Testing of code outside the U.S. is limited to fake data usage
- Compliance with security policies outlined regarding foreign adversaries
- Clear pricing models tailored for multiple state agency usage
- Consider offering tiered pricing based on features utilized
- Include potential costs for training and support services
- Consider partnering with cybersecurity compliance firms
- Teaming with local providers who understand state regulations could enhance proposals
- Potential delays in acquiring vendor software that meets all outlined requirements
- Concerns regarding the integration of new software with existing state systems
- Ensuring compliance with regulatory changes during RFI response formulation
- What is the typical implementation timeline for your solution?
- Can you provide case studies of similar clients you have supported?
- What are your ongoing support options after deployment?
Some notices publish limited source detail. Confirm these points before final bid/no-bid decisions.
- Specific details on the RFI response format
- Confirmation on the exact technology stack needed for integration
- Clarification on any future procurement processes following this RFI
FAQ
How do I use the Market Snapshot?
It summarizes awarded-contract behavior for the opportunity’s NAICS and sector, including a recent pricing band (P10–P90), momentum, and composition. Use it as context, not a guarantee.
Is the data live?
The signal updates as new awarded notices enter the system. Always validate the official award and solicitation details on SAM.gov.
What do P10 and P90 mean?
P10 is the 10th percentile award size and P90 is the 90th percentile. Together they describe the typical spread of award values.