RFP for Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis Tool (PCS# 110400-01789-RFP)
Federal opportunity from University of Oregon. Place of performance: OR. Response deadline: Jul 30, 2025.
Market snapshot
Baseline awarded-market signal across all contracting (sample of 400 recent awards; refreshed periodically).
Related hubs & trends
Navigate the lattice: hubs for browsing, trends for pricing signals.
Applicable Wage Determinations
SAM WDOL references matched to this opportunity's location and scope language.
View more for this contract3 more WD matches and 36 more rate previews.↓
Point of Contact
Agency & Office
Description
RFP for Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis Tool (PCS# 110400-01789-RFP)
Files
Files size/type shown when available.
BidPulsar Analysis
A practical, capture-style breakdown of fit, requirements, risks, and next steps.
The University of Oregon has released an RFP for a Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis Tool under PCS# 110400-01789-RFP, with a response deadline of July 30, 2025. This request indicates a significant opportunity for firms experienced in developing or supplying scientific instrumentation specifically focused on nanoparticle tracking. Respondents should be prepared to demonstrate their expertise in this specialized field and provide comprehensive proposals.
The University of Oregon aims to acquire a sophisticated tool for tracking nanoparticles, implying a commitment to advancing research capabilities in materials sciences or related disciplines.
- Companies specializing in scientific instrumentation.
- Vendors with experience in nanoparticle technology.
- Firms with robust support and training offerings for complex lab equipment.
- Understand and analyze nanoparticle tracking requirements.
- Develop and submit a comprehensive proposal addressing technical specifications.
- Provide demonstration or sample data if applicable.
- Detail support and maintenance options for the tool.
- Outline pricing structure including any ongoing costs.
- Executive summary of the proposal.
- Technical specifications of the proposed tool.
- Pricing information and options.
- Support and maintenance strategies.
- Company qualifications and relevant experience.
More BidPulsar strategy notesCompliance, pricing, teaming, risks, questions, and coverage notes
- Ensure alignment with all state procurement regulations.
- Include required certifications for scientific equipment.
- Consider tiered pricing for different purchasing options or support plans.
- Research costs associated with similar nanoparticle tracking tools to remain competitive.
- Partnerships with research institutions for better credibility in the proposal.
- Potential collaboration with tech firms experienced in data analytics or software development.
- Potential changes in technology requirements by the university.
- Competitors with advanced or proprietary nanoparticle tracking solutions.
- What specific features or capabilities does the University prioritize for the nanoparticle tracking tool?
- Are there existing systems in place that this new tool must integrate with?
- What is the anticipated volume and frequency of use for the tool by the university?
Some notices publish limited source detail. Confirm these points before final bid/no-bid decisions.
- Specific technical requirements for the nanoparticle tracking tool are not detailed.
- No information on budget constraints or funding availability provided.
- Absence of vendor qualifications or certifications required for submission.
- No details on how proposals will be evaluated or scored.
- Lack of specifications for delivery schedule or implementation timeline.
FAQ
How do I use the Market Snapshot?
It summarizes awarded-contract behavior for the opportunity’s NAICS and sector, including a recent pricing band (P10–P90), momentum, and composition. Use it as context, not a guarantee.
Is the data live?
The signal updates as new awarded notices enter the system. Always validate the official award and solicitation details on SAM.gov.
What do P10 and P90 mean?
P10 is the 10th percentile award size and P90 is the 90th percentile. Together they describe the typical spread of award values.