Best fit for this contractDavis-Bacon
OR20260070 (Rev 1)Match signal: state matchOpen WD
Published Jan 23, 2026Oregon • Josephine
Rate
Base $53.94Fringe $16.81
Rate
Base $47.04Fringe $21.84
+29 more occupation rates available in the full WD.
APS Screening RFP
Solicitation: Not available
Notice ID: state_or_oregonbuys__S-X24000-00016371
Department • NW Senior & Disability ServicesAgency • X2400002 - Contracting | X2400 - ContractingState • ORPosted • —Due • Apr 20, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC• Closes in 9 days
Federal opportunity from X2400002 - Contracting | X2400 - Contracting • NW Senior & Disability Services. Place of performance: OR. Response deadline: Apr 20, 2026.
Market snapshot
Baseline awarded-market signal across all contracting (sample of 400 recent awards; refreshed periodically).
12-month awarded value
$7,092,954,764
Sector total $7,092,954,764 • Share 100.0%
Live
Median
$226,501
P10–P90
$30,957–$1,270,186
Volatility
Volatile200%
Market composition
NAICS share of sector
A simple concentration signal, not a forecast.
100.0%
share
Momentum (last 3 vs prior 3 buckets)
+100%($7,092,954,764)
Deal sizing
$226,501 median
Use as a pricing centerline.
Live signal is computed from awarded notices already observed in the system.
Signals shown are descriptive of observed awards; not a forecast.
Related hubs & trends
Navigate the lattice: hubs for browsing, trends for pricing signals.
Live POP
Place of performance
Gloria Kincade
3410 Cherry Ave NE
Salem, OR 97303
US
Email: gloria.kincade@nwsds.org
Phone: (503) 304-3482
State: OR
Contracting office
Not listed
Applicable Wage Determinations
SAM WDOL references matched to this opportunity's location and scope language.
View more for this contract3 more WD matches and 29 more rate previews.↓
View more for this contract
3 more WD matches and 29 more rate previews.
Davis-BaconBest fitstate match
OR20260070 (Rev 1)Published Jan 23, 2026Oregon • Josephine
Rate
Base $53.94Fringe $16.81
Rate
Base $47.04Fringe $21.84
Rate
Base $56.66Fringe $16.90
+28 more occupation rates in this WD
Davis-Baconstate match
OR20260011 (Rev 1)Published Jan 23, 2026Oregon • Lake, Malheur, Morrow +6
Rate
Base $36.27Fringe $14.03
Rate
Base $33.48Fringe $14.03
Rate
Base $41.67Fringe $19.08
+20 more occupation rates in this WD
Davis-Baconstate match
OR20260005 (Rev 1)Published Jan 23, 2026Oregon • Douglas
Rate
Base $33.41Fringe $18.20
Rate
Base $39.34Fringe $22.45
Rate
Base $54.75Fringe $16.90
+16 more occupation rates in this WD
Davis-Baconstate match
OR20260006 (Rev 1)Published Jan 23, 2026Oregon • Josephine
Rate
Base $33.41Fringe $18.20
Rate
Base $54.75Fringe $16.90
Rate
Base $53.60Fringe $16.90
+15 more occupation rates in this WD
Point of Contact
Not available
Agency & Office
Department
NW Senior & Disability Services
Agency
X2400002 - Contracting | X2400 - Contracting
Subagency
X2400002 - Contracting | X2400 - Contracting
Office
Gloria Kincade | gloria.kincade@nwsds.org | (503) 304-3482
Contracting Office Address
Not available
Description
APS Screening RFP NWSDS is seeking a qualified research partner to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of Adult Protective Services screening models, specifically examining the impact of local office-based screening versus centralized screening systems. This study will assess operational effectiveness, consumer outcomes, timeliness, accuracy of screening determinations, and system sustainability under both models. The evaluation will include quantitative and qualitative analysis and provide recommendations. NWSDS is seeking a qualified research partner to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of Adult Protective Services (APS) screening models, specifically examining the impact of local office-based screening versus centralized screening systems. This study will assess operational effectiveness, consumer outcomes, timeliness, accuracy of screening determinations, and system sustainability under both models. The evaluation will include quantitative and qualitative analysis and provide evidence-based recommendations to inform future policy and structural decisions.
Files
Files size/type shown when available.
BidPulsar Analysis
A practical, capture-style breakdown of fit, requirements, risks, and next steps.
Updated: Mar 22, 2026
Client-ready brief
Executive summary
high confidencegpt 4o mini
The NWSDS is seeking a qualified research partner for a comprehensive evaluation of Adult Protective Services screening models. This RFP specifically focuses on comparing local office-based screening with centralized screening systems, analyzing key metrics including operational effectiveness and consumer outcomes. Proposals must be submitted by April 20, 2026, with an emphasis on providing evidence-based recommendations.
Adult Protective Servicesscreening evaluationquantitative analysisqualitative analysispolicy recommendations
What the buyer is trying to do
NWSDS aims to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of different APS screening models to inform future policy decisions. The evaluation will involve both quantitative and qualitative assessments.
Who should pursue this
- Research firms specializing in social services evaluations
- Organizations experienced in qualitative and quantitative research methods
- Consultancies with a focus on public policy and protective services
Work breakdown
- Conduct quantitative analysis of screening models
- Conduct qualitative analysis through stakeholder interviews
- Evaluate operational effectiveness under both models
- Assess consumer outcomes and satisfaction rates
- Analyze timeliness and accuracy of screening determinations
- Evaluate system sustainability
- Provide evidence-based recommendations for future APS policies
Response package checklist
- Detailed project plan outlining methodology
- Team qualifications and relevant experience
- Sample report of past similar work
- Budget proposal and pricing model
- Timeline for project completion
More BidPulsar strategy notesCompliance, pricing, teaming, risks, questions, and coverage notes
Compliance notes
- All research methodologies must adhere to ethical standards in social research
- Consideration of privacy and confidentiality of APS clients
Pricing strategy
- Budget should reflect realistic labor costs and research expenses
- Consider competitive pricing to attract the buyer while ensuring quality
Teaming and subs
- Partner with local non-profits or community organizations for qualitative insights
- Consider subcontracting data analysts or statisticians for robust quantitative evaluations
Risks and watchouts
- Potential challenges in accessing sensitive APS data
- Risk of differing regulations between local offices impacting evaluation
- Possible resistance from stakeholders involved in existing screening processes
Smart questions to ask
- What specific metrics are prioritized for evaluation?
- Are there any existing studies or data that can inform our evaluation?
- How does NWSDS envision the implementation of recommendations?
Source coverage notes
Some notices publish limited source detail. Confirm these points before final bid/no-bid decisions.
- Specific qualifications or certifications required for bidders
- Clarification on the expected sample size for quantitative analysis
- Details on potential stakeholder involvement in the evaluation
- Budget cap or funding limits for the research project
- Information on the frequency of communication with NWSDS during the project
FAQ
How do I use the Market Snapshot?
It summarizes awarded-contract behavior for the opportunity’s NAICS and sector, including a recent pricing band (P10–P90), momentum, and composition. Use it as context, not a guarantee.
Is the data live?
The signal updates as new awarded notices enter the system. Always validate the official award and solicitation details on SAM.gov.
What do P10 and P90 mean?
P10 is the 10th percentile award size and P90 is the 90th percentile. Together they describe the typical spread of award values.