RFQ for Project Management - Knappa School District
Federal opportunity from Knappa School District. Place of performance: OR. Response deadline: Apr 19, 2022.
Market snapshot
Baseline awarded-market signal across all contracting (sample of 400 recent awards; refreshed periodically).
Related hubs & trends
Navigate the lattice: hubs for browsing, trends for pricing signals.
Applicable Wage Determinations
SAM WDOL references matched to this opportunity's location and scope language.
View more for this contract3 more WD matches and 46 more rate previews.↓
Point of Contact
Agency & Office
Description
RFQ for Project Management - Knappa School District
Files
Files size/type shown when available.
BidPulsar Analysis
A practical, capture-style breakdown of fit, requirements, risks, and next steps.
Knappa School District has issued an RFQ titled “RFQ for Project Management - Knappa School District.” The response deadline is 2022-04-19 at 15:00 UTC. The opportunity appears to be for project management services, but the notice provides no scope, deliverables, or project context beyond the title/description text. A bidder should be prepared to present relevant project management credentials and an approach tailored to K-12 district projects once the full RFQ documents are obtained.
Identify and qualify a project management provider for Knappa School District (likely to oversee one or more district projects), using an RFQ process focused on qualifications rather than a fully-priced solution.
- Project management firms/consultants with demonstrated experience providing PM services to K-12 school districts (specifically able to reference comparable school district work).
- Firms that can respond quickly given the known deadline (2022-04-19 15:00 UTC) and can comply once submission requirements are confirmed from the RFQ.
- Obtain and review the full RFQ package (scope, submission instructions, evaluation criteria).
- Prepare a qualifications package emphasizing project management experience relevant to a school district environment.
- Define proposed PM approach (governance, schedule/cost control, risk management, stakeholder coordination) aligned to the district’s needs as stated in the RFQ.
- Submit by the stated deadline (2022-04-19 15:00 UTC) in the format required by the RFQ.
- Cover letter referencing “RFQ for Project Management - Knappa School District” and the associated notice.
- Firm/consultant qualifications and relevant project management project summaries (tailored to Knappa School District needs once scope is known).
- Key personnel resumes for proposed project manager(s) and supporting roles.
- Past performance references for comparable project management engagements (ideally school district clients if applicable).
- Project management methodology/approach summary (schedule, budget, change control, reporting cadence, risk register approach).
- Any required forms/certifications as specified in the full RFQ (not provided in the notice).
More BidPulsar strategy notesCompliance, pricing, teaming, risks, questions, and coverage notes
- Submit before 2022-04-19 15:00 UTC.
- The notice does not include solicitation number, submission method, or mandatory forms; compliance can only be confirmed after obtaining the full RFQ documents.
- As this is an RFQ, expect emphasis on qualifications; include a clear rate/fee basis only if the RFQ requests it (unknown from the notice).
- Be ready to propose a transparent fee structure commonly used for PM (e.g., hourly rates by role or not-to-exceed), but only align to what the RFQ explicitly allows once reviewed.
- If the RFQ’s underlying project involves facilities or capital projects (unknown), consider teaming with firms that have school district capital program support experience; confirm relevance once the RFQ scope is obtained.
- If local presence is valued (unknown), consider a local Oregon-based PM resource or subcontractor, but only if the RFQ indicates such preferences.
- Scope risk: the notice provides no project description beyond “Project Management,” making it difficult to tailor the qualifications package without the full RFQ.
- Submission risk: missing solicitation number, submission instructions, and required forms could lead to noncompliance if not obtained quickly.
- Timing risk: the deadline is fixed (2022-04-19 15:00 UTC), and the lack of accessible attachments/links in the notice increases the chance of late discovery of requirements.
- Can the district provide the full RFQ document and any attachments (scope, evaluation criteria, required forms)?
- What is the project(s) to be managed (type, size, budget range, schedule expectations)?
- What is the expected period of performance and start date for the project management services?
- What submission method is required (portal/email/hard copy), and are there formatting/page limits?
- What are the evaluation criteria and weighting (qualifications, staff, past performance, approach, price if applicable)?
- Are there any mandatory site walks, pre-proposal meetings, or Q&A deadlines?
- Is the district seeking an individual PM, an on-call pool, or a firm with multiple resources?
- What reporting cadence and stakeholder engagement expectations does the district have (board updates, community comms, etc.)?
Some notices publish limited source detail. Confirm these points before final bid/no-bid decisions.
- RFQ document/attachments (scope, submission instructions, required forms, evaluation criteria)
- Solicitation number and official submission method/location
- Project details to be managed (type, size, budget, schedule)
- Place of performance
- Period of performance start/end
FAQ
How do I use the Market Snapshot?
It summarizes awarded-contract behavior for the opportunity’s NAICS and sector, including a recent pricing band (P10–P90), momentum, and composition. Use it as context, not a guarantee.
Is the data live?
The signal updates as new awarded notices enter the system. Always validate the official award and solicitation details on SAM.gov.
What do P10 and P90 mean?
P10 is the 10th percentile award size and P90 is the 90th percentile. Together they describe the typical spread of award values.