Educator Equity Plan Support
Federal opportunity from APA - Academic Policy & Authorization | APA - Academic Policy & Authorization • Higher Education Coordinating Commission. Place of performance: OR. Response deadline: Mar 24, 2026.
Support routes that fit this solicitation
Market snapshot
Baseline awarded-market signal across all contracting (sample of 400 recent awards; refreshed periodically).
Related hubs & trends
Navigate the lattice: hubs for browsing, trends for pricing signals.
Applicable Wage Determinations
SAM WDOL references matched to this opportunity's location and scope language.
View more for this contract3 more WD matches and 33 more rate previews.↓
Point of Contact
Agency & Office
Description
Educator Equity Plan Support
A vendor to support OR public educator preparation programs (EPPs) in the identification, development, implementation, and evaluation of evidence-based strategies, practices, and policies that support high quality preparation, recruitment, and retention of educator candidates.
Files
Files size/type shown when available.
BidPulsar Analysis
A practical, capture-style breakdown of fit, requirements, risks, and next steps.
The State of Oregon is seeking a vendor to provide support for public educator preparation programs (EPPs) as outlined in Solicitation ID S-52500-00016117. The primary focus is on identifying, developing, implementing, and evaluating evidence-based strategies and practices related to the recruitment and retention of educator candidates. Proposals must be submitted by March 24, 2026.
The buyer aims to enhance education quality in Oregon by improving the recruitment and retention of educator candidates through effective strategies and policies in EPPs.
- Education consulting firms specializing in EPPs.
- Organizations experienced in evidence-based policy development.
- Companies with a track record in educator training and retention.
- Identify evidence-based strategies for educator recruitment and retention.
- Develop training programs and resources for EPPs.
- Implement best practices across multiple programs.
- Evaluate the effectiveness of implemented strategies and practices.
- Detailed project approach and methodology.
- Experience and qualifications of key personnel.
- Case studies or examples of previous similar work.
- Timeline and milestones for project execution.
- Budget proposal and pricing strategy.
More BidPulsar strategy notesCompliance, pricing, teaming, risks, questions, and coverage notes
- Ensure alignment with Oregon's educational policies.
- Adherence to data protection regulations in education.
- Consider a fixed-price model to outline clear costs.
- Include potential variable costs related to project scope changes.
- Partner with local universities or educational organizations.
- Engage with data analytics firms for evaluation metrics.
- Collaborate with workforce development agencies.
- Changes in education policy that may affect project scope.
- Challenges in stakeholder engagement from EPPs.
- Potential shifts in funding availability impacting project sustainability.
- What specific outcomes does the agency prioritize for EPP support?
- Are there existing frameworks or resources that we should align with?
- What is the expected level of collaboration with current EPPs?
Some notices publish limited source detail. Confirm these points before final bid/no-bid decisions.
- No start or end dates for the period of performance provided.
- Lack of detail on specific EPPs involved in the project.
- No budget range specified for proposal guidance.
- No information on evaluation criteria for proposals.
- Absence of specific deliverables beyond general support.
FAQ
How do I use the Market Snapshot?
It summarizes awarded-contract behavior for the opportunity’s NAICS and sector, including a recent pricing band (P10–P90), momentum, and composition. Use it as context, not a guarantee.
Is the data live?
The signal updates as new awarded notices enter the system. Always validate the official award and solicitation details on SAM.gov.
What do P10 and P90 mean?
P10 is the 10th percentile award size and P90 is the 90th percentile. Together they describe the typical spread of award values.