RFP 20262033 Goodpasture Island Road Bridge Seismic Retrofits
Federal opportunity from KE001007 - Purchasing | 001 - MHPurchasing • City of Eugene. Place of performance: OR. Response deadline: Mar 25, 2026.
Support routes that fit this solicitation
Market snapshot
Baseline awarded-market signal across all contracting (sample of 400 recent awards; refreshed periodically).
Related hubs & trends
Navigate the lattice: hubs for browsing, trends for pricing signals.
Applicable Wage Determinations
SAM WDOL references matched to this opportunity's location and scope language.
View more for this contract3 more WD matches and 33 more rate previews.↓
Point of Contact
Agency & Office
Description
RFP 20262033 Goodpasture Island Road Bridge Seismic Retrofits
City of Eugene is accepting sealed Proposals for Goodpasture Island Road Bridge Seismic retrofits. This contract is to provide engineering services through permitting, final design, and construction bidding.
Files
Files size/type shown when available.
BidPulsar Analysis
A practical, capture-style breakdown of fit, requirements, risks, and next steps.
The City of Eugene is soliciting sealed proposals for “RFP 20262033 Goodpasture Island Road Bridge Seismic Retrofits.” The selected consultant will provide engineering services spanning permitting, final design, and construction bidding for seismic retrofit work on the Goodpasture Island Road Bridge. Proposals are due 2026-03-25T14:30:00+00:00. Four downloadable attachments are provided via OregonBuys and should be reviewed immediately to confirm scope, evaluation criteria, and submission instructions.
Retain an engineering consultant to take a bridge seismic retrofit project from permitting through final design and into the construction bidding phase for the Goodpasture Island Road Bridge (Goodpasture Island Road).
- Bridge engineering firms with demonstrated seismic retrofit design experience
- Prime consultants that can deliver end-to-end services: permitting + final design + bid-phase support
- Teams with in-house or tightly partnered structural/bridge design and permitting capabilities for transportation infrastructure
- Review RFP 20262033 requirements and existing conditions information in the OregonBuys attachments
- Develop seismic retrofit design approach for the Goodpasture Island Road Bridge
- Advance project through permitting (prepare/submit permit application materials as required by the RFP)
- Produce final design package suitable for construction procurement (plans/specs/engineer’s estimate if required by RFP)
- Provide bid-phase engineering support through construction bidding (e.g., responding to bidder questions, addenda support)
- Coordinate with City of Eugene stakeholders and any third-party agencies implicated by permitting (as defined in the attachments)
- Confirm required submittal format and delivery method for “sealed Proposals” per RFP attachments
- Technical approach describing permitting, final design, and construction bidding support for bridge seismic retrofits
- Project team organization and key personnel roles specific to bridge seismic retrofit design and permitting
- Relevant project experience (bridge seismic retrofit and similar bridge retrofit design)
- Schedule narrative aligned to the RFP milestones (verify in attachments)
- Cost/fee proposal format as required by the RFP attachments
- Signed forms/certifications included in the OregonBuys attachments (verify which are mandatory)
More BidPulsar strategy notesCompliance, pricing, teaming, risks, questions, and coverage notes
- Proposal must be submitted as a sealed proposal per City of Eugene’s RFP 20262033 instructions (details likely in attachments)
- Submission deadline is 2026-03-25T14:30:00+00:00; confirm timezone handling and any portal/upload constraints in OregonBuys instructions
- Review all four OregonBuys attachments to ensure all required forms, certifications, and response structure are met
- Price around a clearly defined level-of-effort for three phases explicitly stated: permitting, final design, and construction bidding support
- Structure fees by task/phase to make scope control explicit; identify assumptions and exclusions tied to permitting and bid support (as allowed by the RFP)
- If alternates/options are described in attachments (e.g., additional investigations or bid support hours), price them as separate optional line items to remain competitive while protecting margin
- Consider a subconsultant with specialized bridge seismic analysis/retrofit expertise if the prime lacks recent seismic retrofit delivery
- If permitting is expected to be intensive, team with an environmental/permitting specialist familiar with transportation infrastructure permitting (only if indicated in attachments)
- If geotechnical, survey, or inspection support is referenced in attachments, line up qualified subs to cover those disciplines
- Scope ambiguity risk: the brief only states “engineering services through permitting, final design, and construction bidding”; critical details (existing bridge information, required retrofit measures, deliverable list) are likely only in attachments
- Permitting risk: schedule and effort can vary widely depending on permit types and agency coordination requirements (must be confirmed in RFP documents)
- Bid-phase exposure risk: unclear expectations for addenda support and hours during bidding; ensure your proposal limits/defines bid-support effort consistent with the RFP
- Evaluation/compliance risk: “sealed Proposals” implies strict submission rules—noncompliance with formatting, signatures, or delivery method could disqualify
- Which specific permits are anticipated for the Goodpasture Island Road Bridge seismic retrofit, and which agencies are involved?
- What existing documentation is available (as-builts, prior seismic assessments, inspection reports), and is it included in the attachments?
- What are the required final design deliverables (plans/specifications/engineer’s estimate/calculations) and required design standards?
- What is the expected level of bid-phase support (number of addenda anticipated, response time expectations, meeting attendance)?
- Are there any required meetings, site visits, or stakeholder coordination obligations that must be included in the fee?
- Is the procurement best-value or qualifications-based with separate cost evaluation, and what are the published evaluation criteria and weighting (per attachments)?
Some notices publish limited source detail. Confirm these points before final bid/no-bid decisions.
- Key scope specifics, deliverables, standards, and submission/evaluation requirements are contained in the four OregonBuys attachments but are not provided in the brief JSON.
FAQ
How do I use the Market Snapshot?
It summarizes awarded-contract behavior for the opportunity’s NAICS and sector, including a recent pricing band (P10–P90), momentum, and composition. Use it as context, not a guarantee.
Is the data live?
The signal updates as new awarded notices enter the system. Always validate the official award and solicitation details on SAM.gov.
What do P10 and P90 mean?
P10 is the 10th percentile award size and P90 is the 90th percentile. Together they describe the typical spread of award values.