FY26 - MEP Greenfield Phase I ESA - RFQ- Ticket#374129
Federal opportunity from ENVOPS - Operations • Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs. Place of performance: MA. Response deadline: Mar 13, 2026. Industry: NAICS 77, 10, 20.
Market snapshot
Baseline awarded-market signal across all contracting (sample of 400 recent awards; refreshed periodically).
Related hubs & trends
Navigate the lattice: hubs for browsing, trends for pricing signals.
Applicable Wage Determinations
SAM WDOL references matched to this opportunity's location and scope language.
View more for this contract3 more WD matches and 64 more rate previews.↓
Point of Contact
Agency & Office
Description
FY26 - MEP Greenfield Phase I ESA - RFQ- Ticket#374129
Files
Files size/type shown when available.
BidPulsar Analysis
A practical, capture-style breakdown of fit, requirements, risks, and next steps.
The FY26 - MEP Greenfield Phase I ESA presents an opportunity for small businesses as it is set aside for SBPP eligibility. The response deadline is March 13, 2026, and this opportunity falls under the UNSPSC 77-10-20 classification. Bidders should carefully review the RFQ details outlined in the provided documentation link.
The buyer aims to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the MEP Greenfield project, ensuring compliance with environmental regulations and identifying any potential environmental liabilities.
- Small businesses experienced in environmental assessments.
- Firms with expertise in Phase I ESA processes.
- Service providers familiar with UNSPSC 77-10-20 standards.
- Review RFQ documentation thoroughly.
- Prepare technical proposal focusing on environmental assessments.
- Include past performance examples relevant to Phase I ESAs.
- Detail the methodologies to be used for the assessment.
- Prepare pricing based on the scope of work defined in the RFQ.
- Cover letter addressing the RFQ.
- Technical proposal as per the RFQ specifications.
- Pricing detail including all relevant costs.
- Sample past performance documentation.
- Resumes of key personnel involved.
More BidPulsar strategy notesCompliance, pricing, teaming, risks, questions, and coverage notes
- Ensure all submissions meet SBPP standards.
- Follow environmental assessment guidelines as specified in the RFQ.
- Include any requested certifications or qualifications.
- Develop a competitive pricing model based on estimated time and resources needed for the ESA.
- Consider potential risks and contingencies that may affect pricing.
- Partner with local environmental consultancies for expertise.
- Subcontract with firms that specialize in regulatory compliance.
- Potential complications with environmental liabilities found during assessment.
- Difficulty in obtaining necessary data from existing sources.
- Tight turnaround time for submissions may limit participation.
- Is there an existing environmental report that can be referenced?
- What specific formats or documents are required in the proposal?
- Can pre-proposal meetings be scheduled to clarify scope details?
Some notices publish limited source detail. Confirm these points before final bid/no-bid decisions.
- Detailed scope of work for the Phase I ESA is not provided.
- Specific evaluation criteria for proposals missing.
- Any pre-bid meeting dates or opportunities are unclear.
- No information on past bidders available.
- Location of work performance is unspecified.
- Buyer contact information is not listed.
- Evaluation timeline post-deadline is unknown.
- Exact funding limits for the project are not detailed.
FAQ
How do I use the Market Snapshot?
It summarizes awarded-contract behavior for the opportunity’s NAICS and sector, including a recent pricing band (P10–P90), momentum, and composition. Use it as context, not a guarantee.
Is the data live?
The signal updates as new awarded notices enter the system. Always validate the official award and solicitation details on SAM.gov.
What do P10 and P90 mean?
P10 is the 10th percentile award size and P90 is the 90th percentile. Together they describe the typical spread of award values.