Best fitDavis-Baconstate match
MA20260001 (Rev 1)Published May 18, 2026Massachusetts • Barnstable, Bristol, Dukes +5
90 occupation rates available in the full WD.
2019-MeHI-02 Digital Health Sandbox Program
Solicitation: BD-19-1367-1367C-1367L-38752
Notice ID: ma_commbuys_a1501419cb93973eb8fc
Department • Massachusetts Technology CollaborativeState • MAPosted • —Due • Jun 10, 2030, 03:00 PM UTC• Closes in 1477 daysBid range • $316,256 - $374,822
Contract snapshot
Federal opportunity from Massachusetts Technology Collaborative. Place of performance: MA. Response deadline: Jun 10, 2030.
- Source
- Open on official portal →
- Solicitation
- BD-19-1367-1367C-1367L-38752
- Performance
- MA
- Response
- Jun 10, 2030, 03:00 PM UTC
Live POP
Place of performance
MA
Contracting office
Not listed
Point of Contact
Name
Legal Department
Email
Not available
Phone
Not available
Agency & Office
Department
Massachusetts Technology Collaborative
Agency
Not available
Subagency
Not available
Office
Legal Department
Contracting Office Address
Not available
Applicable wage determinations
Best public WD match for the notice location and scope.
View more WD detail3 more WD matches and 88 more rate previews.↓
View more WD detail
3 more WD matches and 88 more rate previews.
Davis-BaconBest fitstate match
MA20260001 (Rev 1)Published May 18, 2026Massachusetts • Barnstable, Bristol, Dukes +5
Rate
Base $55.45Fringe $36.63
Rate
Base $55.45Fringe $36.63
Rate
Base $55.45Fringe $36.63
+87 more occupation rates in this WD
Davis-Baconstate match
MA20260014 (Rev 1)Published May 18, 2026Massachusetts • Dukes, Nantucket
Rate
Base $43.33Fringe $27.82
Rate
Base $39.12Fringe $31.04
Rate
Base $42.88Fringe $31.04
+6 more occupation rates in this WD
Davis-Baconstate match
MA20260009 (Rev 1)Published May 18, 2026Massachusetts • Dukes, Nantucket
Rate
Base $50.62Fringe $28.82
Rate
Base $63.44Fringe $37.33
Rate
Base $64.52Fringe $37.51
+40 more occupation rates in this WD
Davis-Baconstate match
MA20260024 (Rev 1)Published May 18, 2026Massachusetts • Suffolk
Rate
Base $66.17Fringe $37.08
Rate
Base $57.18Fringe $33.70
Rate
Base $57.83Fringe $33.70
+23 more occupation rates in this WD
Description
UPDATED 7-30-2025. The Massachusetts eHealth Institute, a division of the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative, is offering grants on a rolling basis to fund projects to support companies looking to test and validate new products and services in a sandbox environment.
Advisory bid range
Pricing and bid posture
$316,256 - $374,822
Contractor-side estimate from visible notice metadata, NAICS/PSC, contract type, schedule hints, and BidPulsar workpaper assumptions. Not an IGCE, incumbent price, award value, or government budget.
Floor
$316,256
Target
$334,663
Premium
$374,822
Labor
$167,120
Direct
$15,500
Burden
$112,136
Fee + reserve
$39,442
Target $334,663Hybrid workpaper with explicit assumptions4 modeled rows
This advisory bid range is visible page text for contractors and search engines: it summarizes the modeled floor, target, and premium bid posture for this solicitation.
Market snapshot
Baseline awarded-market signal across all contracting (sample of 400 recent awards; refreshed periodically).
12-month awarded value
$3,508,313,935
Sector total $3,508,313,935 • Share 100.0%
Live
Median
$350,000
P10–P90
$32,459–$3,256,200
Volatility
Volatile200%
Market composition
NAICS share of sector
A simple concentration signal, not a forecast.
100.0%
share
Momentum (last 3 vs prior 3 buckets)
+100%($3,508,313,935)
Deal sizing
$350,000 median
Use as a pricing centerline.
Live signal is computed from awarded notices already observed in the system.
Signals shown are descriptive of observed awards; not a forecast.
Files
Files size/type shown when available.
No public attachments surfaced yet. Some owner portals gate files behind registration, and BidPulsar keeps enriching the package as new public links appear.
BidPulsar Analysis
A practical, capture-style breakdown of fit, requirements, risks, and next steps.
Updated: Feb 17, 2026
Client-ready brief
Executive summary
medium confidencegpt 5.2
The Massachusetts eHealth Institute (MeHI), a division of the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative, is offering grants on a rolling basis under the “2019-MeHI-02 Digital Health Sandbox Program.” The notice was updated 7-30-2025 and is intended to fund projects that help companies test and validate new digital health products and services in a sandbox environment. The response deadline shown is 2030-06-10T15:00:00+00:00, indicating an ongoing intake rather than a single competitive bid window. The opportunity appears best suited to product companies (or teams) that can propose a specific sandbox testing plan with measurable validation outcomes and a clear pathway from test results to adoption or commercialization.
Massachusetts eHealth InstituteMeHIDigital Health Sandbox ProgramMassachusetts Technology Collaborativesandbox environmenttest and validaterolling basis grants
What the buyer is trying to do
Provide grant funding (on a rolling basis) for projects that enable companies to test and validate new digital health products and services within a sandbox environment administered/offered by MeHI (Massachusetts Technology Collaborative).
Who should pursue this
- Digital health companies seeking grant support to test and validate a specific new product or service in a sandbox environment
- Teams with a concrete validation plan and the ability to execute sandbox-based testing and produce evidence/reporting artifacts
- Organizations prepared to operate under a grant model (milestones, reporting, deliverables) rather than a services contract
Work breakdown
- Identify the digital health product/service to be tested and the specific validation objectives for a sandbox environment
- Define the sandbox test plan (test scenarios, participants/users, data needs, success metrics, evaluation approach)
- Execute testing/validation activities in the sandbox environment
- Document findings and outcomes from testing/validation (evidence generated, performance/usability/feasibility results)
- Report results to MeHI per grant requirements and update plans based on validation outcomes
Response package checklist
- Program application/grant response as required by the “2019-MeHI-02 Digital Health Sandbox Program” documents
- Project narrative describing the product/service to be tested and what ‘validation’ will prove
- Sandbox testing plan including metrics and evaluation methodology
- Project schedule aligned to rolling submission and any program milestone structure
- Budget and budget narrative appropriate for a grant-funded project
- Documentation required by attachments in the Commbuys notice (forms, certifications, required exhibits)
More BidPulsar strategy notesCompliance, pricing, teaming, risks, questions, and coverage notes
Compliance notes
- Rolling basis grants: confirm submission cadence, eligibility rules, and any periodic review cycles in the attached program materials
- Use the Commbuys attachments for the authoritative application instructions and required forms (multiple downloadable files are referenced in the notice)
Pricing strategy
- Treat this as a grant budget (costed project plan) rather than a fixed-price services bid; align spend to discrete validation milestones and measurable outcomes
- Build the budget around the minimum work needed to generate credible validation evidence in the sandbox environment, with clear justification tied to the test plan
Teaming and subs
- Consider teaming with evaluation/clinical informatics partners to strengthen the validation methodology (only if allowed/encouraged in the grant documents)
- Consider subcontract support for UX research/testing execution and results analysis if internal capacity is limited, ensuring the prime remains the product owner and accountable for outcomes
Risks and watchouts
- Notice details are thin in the public description; key requirements are likely contained in the Commbuys attachments—missing or noncompliant forms could render an application incomplete
- Because it is a rolling basis grant program, timing and funding availability may vary; confirm any scoring, batching, or periodic award cycles in the program documents
- ‘Sandbox environment’ expectations (data access, integration constraints, security/privacy obligations) are unknown from the brief and could materially affect feasibility, schedule, and budget
Smart questions to ask
- What are the eligibility requirements for applicants under 2019-MeHI-02 (company stage, location, product maturity), and are there restrictions on prior awardees?
- What constitutes the ‘sandbox environment’ for this program (available platforms, datasets, integration capabilities, and any required tooling)?
- What deliverables and reporting are required for grantees (interim reports, final report format, evidence expectations)?
- How are rolling submissions reviewed (continuous review vs. periodic cutoffs), and how quickly are award decisions typically made?
- Are there required privacy/security standards for testing (e.g., handling of health data) and any mandatory agreements participants must sign?
Source coverage notes
Some notices publish limited source detail. Confirm these points before final bid/no-bid decisions.
- Grant/application requirements, eligibility rules, evaluation criteria, award size limits, and required forms (appear to be in the linked attachments but are not provided in the brief)
- Defined deliverables and reporting cadence for funded projects
- Details of the sandbox environment (technical stack, data availability, integration/security requirements)
- Posted date, solicitation number, and notice type fields are not provided
- Period of performance dates and place of performance are not provided
Federal Bid Partners
Service match
Optional support routes matched to this notice after the core solicitation details.
Need help writing this bid?
Route this notice into proposal, compliance, and submission support without burying the solicitation record.
Other matched support routes↓
Related hubs & trends
Navigate the lattice: hubs for browsing, trends for pricing signals.