Best fit for this contractDavis-Bacon
MD20260082 (Rev 0)Match signal: state matchOpen WD
Published Jan 02, 2026Maryland • Anne Arundel
Rate
Base $47.92Fringe $24.44
Rate
Base $37.50Fringe $14.78
+84 more occupation rates available in the full WD.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RFP FINANCIAL AUDIT
Solicitation: Not available
Notice ID: 60108cfd1f4d03632db05f05af0fbe58
Federal opportunity from Public Agency. Place of performance: MD.
Market snapshot
Baseline awarded-market signal across all contracting (sample of 400 recent awards; refreshed periodically).
12-month awarded value
$903,760,926
Sector total $903,760,926 • Share 100.0%
Live
Median
$191,909
P10–P90
$26,352–$2,550,765
Volatility
Volatile200%
Market composition
NAICS share of sector
A simple concentration signal, not a forecast.
100.0%
share
Momentum (last 3 vs prior 3 buckets)
+100%($903,760,926)
Deal sizing
$191,909 median
Use as a pricing centerline.
Live signal is computed from awarded notices already observed in the system.
Signals shown are descriptive of observed awards; not a forecast.
Related hubs & trends
Navigate the lattice: hubs for browsing, trends for pricing signals.
Live POP
Place of performance
MD, US
State: US
Contracting office
Not listed
Applicable Wage Determinations
SAM WDOL references matched to this opportunity's location and scope language.
View more for this contract3 more WD matches and 84 more rate previews.↓
View more for this contract
3 more WD matches and 84 more rate previews.
Davis-BaconBest fitstate match
MD20260082 (Rev 0)Published Jan 02, 2026Maryland • Anne Arundel
Rate
Base $47.92Fringe $24.44
Rate
Base $37.50Fringe $14.78
Rate
Base $34.41Fringe $14.49
+83 more occupation rates in this WD
Davis-Baconstate match
MD20260120 (Rev 0)Published Jan 02, 2026Maryland • Montgomery
Rate
Base $47.92Fringe $24.44
Rate
Base $37.50Fringe $14.78
Rate
Base $34.41Fringe $14.49
+77 more occupation rates in this WD
Davis-Baconstate match
MD20260041 (Rev 0)Published Jan 02, 2026Maryland • Howard
Rate
Base $37.50Fringe $14.78
Rate
Base $34.41Fringe $14.49
Rate
Base $34.41Fringe $14.49
+59 more occupation rates in this WD
Davis-Baconstate match
MD20260061 (Rev 0)Published Jan 02, 2026Maryland • Baltimore City
Rate
Base $34.12Fringe $14.64
Rate
Base $21.60Fringe $0.00
Rate
Base $19.41Fringe $3.11
+14 more occupation rates in this WD
Point of Contact
Not available
Agency & Office
Department
Public Agency
Agency
Not available
Subagency
Not available
Office
Procurement
Contracting Office Address
Not available
Description
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RFP FINANCIAL AUDIT
Files
Files size/type shown when available.
No downloadable attachments detected for this notice.
BidPulsar Analysis
A practical, capture-style breakdown of fit, requirements, risks, and next steps.
Updated: Mar 15, 2026
Client-ready brief
Executive summary
low confidencegpt 5.2
This notice is titled “REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RFP FINANCIAL AUDIT” and is issued by a “Public Agency.” The opportunity description contains only the same phrase (“REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RFP FINANCIAL AUDIT”) and provides no additional scope, deadlines, or submission instructions. Based on the limited detail, this appears to be a procurement for financial audit services, but the RFP document/attachments are not included here. Before bidding, you will need the full RFP package (including audit scope, period, and reporting requirements) to confirm eligibility, effort, and compliance.
financial auditRFPpublic agency auditaudit reportmanagement letterfinancial statements
What the buyer is trying to do
Obtain a vendor to perform a financial audit for a Public Agency under an RFP process (details such as audit period, standards, and deliverables are not provided in the brief).
Who should pursue this
- CPA firms (or audit firms) with demonstrable experience delivering financial audit engagements for public-sector entities (Public Agency).
- Firms that can staff an audit team and produce formal audit reports/opinions per the RFP’s specified standards (not provided in this brief).
Work breakdown
- Acquire and review the full RFP package for the financial audit (scope, standards, fiscal years, reporting).
- Plan and execute the financial audit (fieldwork/testing) consistent with the RFP requirements.
- Prepare and deliver required audit reports/opinions and any management letter/findings required by the RFP.
- Present results to agency stakeholders if required by the RFP (e.g., entrance/exit meetings).
- Support any follow-up Q&A, corrective action tracking, or additional requested schedules if required by the RFP.
Response package checklist
- Signed proposal/offer letter responding to the “REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RFP FINANCIAL AUDIT.”
- Technical approach describing audit methodology, workplan, and quality control (tailored once the RFP is obtained).
- Project team organization, key personnel resumes, and role descriptions for the audit engagement.
- Past performance/references for comparable public agency financial audits.
- Pricing/fee proposal in the format requested by the RFP (not provided in this brief).
- Any required forms/certifications identified in the RFP (not included here).
Compliance notes
- No solicitation number, due date, submission instructions, or attachments are provided in this notice brief; compliance requirements cannot be confirmed without the full RFP.
- PSC/NAICS, set-aside status, and place of performance are not stated; confirm applicability once the RFP is available.
Pricing strategy
- Because the brief provides no scope (fiscal year(s), fund complexity, component units, number of locations, reporting deadlines), treat pricing as non-actionable until the full RFP is obtained.
- Once scope is known, consider structuring fees by audit year/phase (planning, interim/fieldwork, reporting) if the RFP allows, to align pricing with effort and risk.
Teaming and subs
- If specialized compliance or single-audit style requirements exist in the unseen RFP, consider subcontracting niche expertise (only if permitted by the RFP).
- If local presence is required (unknown), consider teaming with a local audit partner for on-site fieldwork coverage.
Risks and watchouts
- High risk of noncompliance: the brief includes no response deadline, format, or mandatory forms—submission could be rejected if the unseen RFP requirements aren’t followed exactly.
- Scope uncertainty: “FINANCIAL AUDIT” could range from a basic financial statement audit to more complex requirements; pricing and staffing risk is significant without the full RFP.
- Eligibility/licensure risk: public agency audits can carry specific independence/licensure requirements; these cannot be validated from the brief alone.
Smart questions to ask
- Where can the full RFP package (including attachments) be obtained for the “REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RFP FINANCIAL AUDIT” notice?
- What is the proposal submission deadline, submission method, and required format?
- What audit period/fiscal year(s) are in scope, and are there multiple years or renewals?
- What standards are required (e.g., specific governmental auditing standards) and what reports/deliverables are required?
- What entity details drive effort (number of funds, component units, locations, prior year findings), and are prior reports available?
- Is there a mandatory pre-proposal conference or Q&A period?
Source coverage notes
Some notices publish limited source detail. Confirm these points before final bid/no-bid decisions.
- Full RFP document/attachments and statement of work
- Response deadline and submission instructions
- Solicitation number and notice type
- Audit period/fiscal years and period of performance
- Applicable audit standards and required deliverables
- Evaluation criteria and award basis
- Place of performance and any on-site requirements
- Pricing format and contract type/term
FAQ
How do I use the Market Snapshot?
It summarizes awarded-contract behavior for the opportunity’s NAICS and sector, including a recent pricing band (P10–P90), momentum, and composition. Use it as context, not a guarantee.
Is the data live?
The signal updates as new awarded notices enter the system. Always validate the official award and solicitation details on SAM.gov.
What do P10 and P90 mean?
P10 is the 10th percentile award size and P90 is the 90th percentile. Together they describe the typical spread of award values.