Solicitation Spotlight: Siemens CT & X-Ray Preventive Maintenance at Camp Humphreys (Army Healthcare)

Executive takeaway

This notice is framed as a sole-source action for firm-fixed-price preventive maintenance and repair of Siemens CT and Siemens X-Ray systems at Brian D. Allgood Army Community Hospital (Camp Humphreys). The buyer states the intended awardee is the exclusive distributor and service provider in South Korea, and that others lack required software rights/authorization. If you are not the OEM (or explicitly authorized with provable software rights and in-country coverage), this is likely a watch-only opportunity—unless you can submit a compelling capability statement that directly addresses the exclusivity claims.

What the buyer is trying to do

The Medical Readiness Contracting Office – Pacific intends to keep government-owned Siemens imaging equipment fully functional by purchasing service that aligns with OEM specifications. The requirement explicitly includes labor, parts, material, and travel needed to repair and/or maintain the CT and X-Ray systems at the hospital in South Korea.

The notice also indicates the buyer is not issuing this as a competitive solicitation at this stage, but will consider capability statements or quotations from responsible sources.

What work is implied (bullets)

• Provide preventive maintenance for Siemens CT and Siemens X-Ray systems in accordance with OEM specifications.
• Perform repair services as needed to keep systems in fully functional condition.
• Provide all labor, parts, material, and travel necessary to execute maintenance/repairs.
• Support a firm-fixed-price, non-personal services contract structure.
• Operate in the Camp Humphreys / South Korea service environment (including logistics and travel planning).
• Be prepared for a longer-term structure (the notice references a base period plus options, including a FAR option to extend).

Who should bid / who should pass (bullets)

• Should bid:
  • Siemens-authorized service providers that can document authorization and software rights to service the covered systems in South Korea.
  • Firms that are the exclusive in-territory distributor/service provider (or can credibly dispute/override that assertion with documentation).
• Should pass (or treat as capability-statement only):
  • Independent service organizations without Siemens authorization/software access for these systems.
  • Firms that cannot realistically support parts, travel, and response in South Korea.
  • Companies that typically rely on third-party parts channels when the buyer is signaling OEM-only support.

Response package checklist (bullets; if unknown say 'verify in attachments')

• Capability statement (tailored to Siemens CT and Siemens X-Ray service in South Korea).
• Documentation of OEM authorization and/or proof of software rights to perform service.
• Proof you can provide labor, parts, material, and travel to the site.
• Evidence you can meet OEM specification requirements (service procedures, quality approach, etc.).
• Firm-fixed-price approach and assumptions (what is included/excluded) — verify in attachments.
• Any required forms, representations, or submission instructions — verify in attachments.

Pricing & strategy notes (how to research pricing; do not invent pricing numbers)

This is positioned as firm-fixed-price OEM-aligned service. To build a defensible price (or to decide not to pursue), focus on cost drivers the buyer explicitly calls out: labor, parts, material, and travel.

• Research comparable OEM service agreement structures for Siemens imaging (PM frequency, covered parts, travel rules) and map them to what you can actually deliver on-site.
• Validate in-territory logistics: typical parts lead times, travel cadence, and whether local stocking is necessary to avoid downtime.
• If submitting a capability statement to challenge sole-source, center your strategy on documented authorization/software rights and in-country service coverage—not generic imaging maintenance experience.
• Confirm the period-of-performance language in the notice/attachments (the snippet contains a date reference that appears inconsistent). Price sensitivity may be tied to the final base/option structure.

Subcontracting / teaming ideas (bullets)

• Team with an in-country partner for travel/logistics support while keeping OEM-authorized technical work with the authorized entity (if allowed).
• If you are a prime with authorization but limited footprint, consider a local subcontractor for non-technical tasks (shipping coordination, site access support) while maintaining compliance with OEM service requirements.
• If you are not authorized, explore becoming a teaming partner to the authorized service provider rather than attempting to prime (assuming the prime will consider additional capacity).

Risks & watch-outs (bullets)

• Sole-source posture: The buyer states exclusivity in South Korea and lack of software rights for others—your response must directly address this or it will not be persuasive.
• Authorization/software rights: This appears to be the gating requirement; experience alone likely will not overcome it.
• Overseas performance: Travel, parts movement, and sustained support in South Korea are explicitly in scope.
• Dates/period language: The notice’s period-of-performance text includes a reference that looks inconsistent; confirm final periods in the official documentation before committing pricing/resources.
• Not a solicitation (yet): The notice says it is neither an RFQ nor a solicitation, but capability statements/quotes may be considered—ensure your submission matches what the buyer will accept.

Related opportunities

• J065--Eppendorf epMotion Service | Follow on Base+2 | Start: 4/19/26
• J065--GE OEC Elite CFD Maintenance *Emergency* Repair Indianapolis, IN
• J065--YAG Laser (Lumines) | Follow on Base+4 | Start: 4/1/26 (Intent to Sole Source)

How to act on this

1. Open the notice and capture the submission instructions and any attachments: Preventive Maintenance and Repair Services for Siemens CT & X-Ray at Camp Humphreys.
2. If you have Siemens authorization/software rights in South Korea, draft a capability statement that proves it and maps directly to OEM-spec PM/repair coverage.
3. If you do not have those rights, decide whether to pursue teaming (instead of priming) or stand down.
4. For help deciding whether to challenge the sole-source posture or to position a compliant response package, engage Federal Bid Partners LLC.

CTA: If you want a fast go/no-go recommendation and a compliance-focused response plan for this notice, work with Federal Bid Partners LLC.