Skip to content
← Back to blog

DLA Aviation cable & wiring buys (NAICS 334419): what to pursue, what to avoid, and how to quote smart

Feb 08, 2026Jordan PatelSolicitation Intelligence Lead5 min readnaics compare
DLA AviationNAICS 334419Cable AssemblyWiring HarnessRFQSDVOSBCSmall Business
Opportunity snapshot
61--CABLE ASSEMBLY
DEPT OF DEFENSEDEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCYSet-aside: SDVOSBCNAICS: 334419PSC: 61
Posted
2026-02-08
Due
2026-02-23T00:00:00+00:00

Related opportunities

Executive takeaway

DLA Aviation is soliciting multiple RFQs for cable assemblies and a wiring harness under NAICS 334419 (mostly from DLA AV Richmond). Several notices include language that the award may result in an Automated IDC with a one-year term or until aggregate orders reach $350,000, plus a stated estimated number of orders and a guaranteed minimum. These can be attractive for manufacturers or distributors who can quickly validate drawings/specs (when available) and manage depot shipping (including potential OCONUS flows). The main “go/no-go” is whether the item is approved source / source-controlled drawing—and whether drawings/specifications are available in the solicitation package.

What the buyer is trying to do

The buyer is replenishing specific NSN-coded aviation-related cable/harness items, typically in small quantities, with delivery tied to a stated number of days ADO (after date of order). Some requirements explicitly anticipate repeat ordering via an Automated IDC (with a $350,000 aggregate cap), shipping to various DLA depots (including CONUS and OCONUS via consolidation/containerization points).

Opportunities in this set include:

  • Cable assembly buys (multiple NSNs), including some with SBA set-aside or SDVOSBC set-aside.
  • A wiring harness requirement with recurring order potential (estimated 12 orders/year stated in the notice snippet).

What work is implied (bullets)

  • Review the RFQ package online (hard copies not available) and prepare an electronic quote.
  • Confirm the exact NSN item requirements and any referenced drawings, Military Specifications and Standards, or source-controlled drawing details (when cited).
  • For notices with Automated IDC language: plan for repeat ordering over a one-year period, with a guaranteed minimum quantity stated in the notice snippet (varies by item).
  • Plan production/procurement and inspection to meet the stated delivery timelines (e.g., 20 days ADO for certain Navy ship-to activities; longer ADO windows for depot shipments on other lines).
  • Prepare for shipping to various CONUS and OCONUS DLA depots (via consolidation/containerization points) where stated.

Who should bid / who should pass (bullets)

  • Bid if:
    • You build or supply cable assemblies/wiring harnesses aligned to NAICS 334419 and can quote small quantities quickly.
    • You can meet approved source constraints when listed (or can legitimately supply under those constraints as allowed by the RFQ).
    • You can comply with source-controlled drawing requirements when the notice states the item is source controlled and must meet the cited drawing.
    • You can support depot shipping, including CONUS/OCONUS flows where indicated.
  • Pass if:
    • You cannot access or comply with the required drawings/specs (especially when the notice says specifications, plans, or drawings are not available).
    • The item is approved source only and you are not an approved source (or cannot meet whatever alternate qualification path is (or is not) provided in the RFQ attachments).
    • Your lead times cannot meet the stated days ADO delivery requirement.

Response package checklist (bullets; if unknown say “verify in attachments”)

  • Completed electronic quote submission (method and portal details: verify in attachments).
  • Pricing by line item and quantity as listed in the RFQ (verify in attachments).
  • Delivery commitment matching the stated days ADO requirement.
  • Technical compliance evidence for drawings/specs (e.g., build-to-print confirmation) where drawings/specs are retrievable (verify in attachments).
  • If the item is source controlled: explicit confirmation that the furnished items meet the cited drawing requirements (verify in attachments).
  • If approved source is referenced: documentation showing you meet approved-source conditions (verify in attachments).
  • Shipping/packaging assumptions suitable for depot delivery to potential CONUS/OCONUS destinations (verify in attachments).

Pricing & strategy notes (how to research pricing; do not invent pricing numbers)

These are small-quantity RFQs where responsiveness and compliance often decide outcomes as much as unit price. A few grounded tactics:

  • Use the NSN as your anchor: build a costed bill of materials and labor routing from the drawing/spec (when available) and quote against the exact configuration.
  • For Automated IDC language: model pricing with the stated estimated number of orders per year and guaranteed minimum in mind. If you have fixed setup costs (tooling, test fixtures, first-article-like effort), consider how to recover them without overloading a small initial order.
  • Account for depot logistics: shipments may go to various DLA depots, including OCONUS via consolidation/containerization points (where stated). Build realistic packaging and transportation handling into your quote assumptions.
  • Validate whether drawings/specs are available: if the notice says specifications/plans/drawings are not available, treat pricing as higher risk unless you already control a proven build package.

Subcontracting / teaming ideas (bullets)

  • Pair a small business prime (for SBA/SDVOSBC set-asides) with a specialized cable harness manufacturer for build-to-print production capacity.
  • Team with a partner experienced in DLA depot shipping (including consolidation/containerization workflows) if OCONUS routing is new to you.
  • If drawings/specs are retrievable electronically, consider teaming with a shop that already has test/inspection capability for cable assemblies to reduce schedule risk.

Risks & watch-outs (bullets)

  • Approved source / source-controlled constraints: at least one notice calls out an approved source and another calls out a source-controlled drawing item; noncompliance can make a quote noncompetitive or unacceptable.
  • “Specifications, plans, or drawings are not available” appears in some notices—this can create quoting ambiguity unless you have prior build knowledge.
  • Automated IDC structure: one-year term or $350,000 aggregate cap is stated in multiple notices; ensure your internal forecasting and stocking approach fits that ordering pattern.
  • Delivery timelines vary widely: some lines indicate very short windows (e.g., 20 days ADO in certain notices) while others are much longer; misreading ADO can sink performance.
  • All-electronic process: hard copies are not available and quotes must be submitted electronically—plan for portal access and file formatting (verify in attachments).

Related opportunities

How to act on this

  1. Open the RFQ link for the specific NSN(s) you can support and pull the solicitation package (and any digitized drawings/specs, if available).
  2. Make a fast go/no-go call on approved source / source-controlled constraints and your ability to meet the stated days ADO.
  3. Build a quote package and submit electronically before the deadline shown on BidPulsar for that notice.
  4. If you want help deciding which of these to chase (or how to position a compliant quote), talk to Federal Bid Partners LLC.

Related posts