Award Watch: ISO 14001 & 45001 Registrar Services (FAA) — What to verify fast before you bid

Executive takeaway

This FAA notice is for ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 registrar services and has a tight turnaround (response deadline shown as 2026-01-27). The public posting includes no description, so your bid/no-bid decision should hinge on what’s in the attachments (scope, locations, audit cycle, and registrar accreditation expectations). If you can’t confirm those basics quickly, this is a high-risk, low-visibility pursuit.

What the buyer is trying to do

The buyer is seeking third-party registrar services tied to ISO standards:

• ISO 14001 (environmental management systems)
• ISO 45001 (occupational health & safety management systems)

Given the “registrar services” framing, the intent is typically certification and/or ongoing audit services under an established ISO program. The posting does not state whether this is initial certification, surveillance audits, recertification, multi-site audits, or a mix—those specifics must be confirmed in the solicitation package.

What work is implied (bullets)

• Provide ISO registrar services for ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 (verify exact deliverables in attachments).
• Plan and execute audits aligned to the buyer’s schedule (verify cadence and audit window constraints).
• Issue required reports and certification decisions consistent with registrar practice (verify report formats and due dates).
• Coordinate audit logistics (sites, remote vs. onsite, access requirements—verify in attachments).
• Support lifecycle needs such as surveillance and recertification (verify whether included).

Who should bid / who should pass (bullets)

• Bid if:
  • You are an established ISO registrar (or can prime as one) covering both ISO 14001 and ISO 45001.
  • You can mobilize quickly and handle short-fuse scheduling and document turnaround.
  • You can operate under federal buyer expectations and documentation rigor (even when the notice text is sparse).
• Pass if:
  • You provide consulting/internal auditing but are not positioned to deliver third-party registrar services.
  • You cannot confirm required accreditations, audit scope, and locations immediately from the attachments.
  • You need long lead times to assemble an audit team or schedule auditors.

Response package checklist (bullets; if unknown say “verify in attachments”)

• Completed solicitation response forms and instructions compliance (verify in attachments).
• Evidence of registrar capability for ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 (verify what proof is requested in attachments).
• Technical approach for audit planning, execution, and reporting (verify required structure in attachments).
• Staffing plan and auditor qualifications (verify in attachments).
• Past performance references relevant to ISO registrar engagements (verify in attachments).
• Pricing submission format (labor, per-audit, per-site, travel assumptions, etc.—verify in attachments).
• Representation/certification requirements (verify in attachments).

Pricing & strategy notes (how to research pricing; do not invent pricing numbers)

• Start with scope discovery: pricing will vary dramatically depending on number of sites, audit duration, onsite vs. remote, and whether this includes initial certification vs. surveillance/recertification. With no description posted, your first move is to pull the attachments and confirm those drivers.
• Benchmark against comparable registrar engagements: review your historical pricing for ISO 14001/45001 audits with similar site counts and complexity; adjust only after confirming travel and scheduling constraints.
• Validate travel and logistics assumptions: if onsite audits are required, travel policy (and whether it’s reimbursable or baked in) can decide competitiveness—verify in attachments.
• Offer clear audit-unit pricing: when scope is ambiguous, a structured price (e.g., per site/per audit event) can reduce misunderstanding—only if allowed by the solicitation instructions (verify in attachments).

Subcontracting / teaming ideas (bullets)

• Team with a registrar partner if you cover only one of the two ISO standards (verify whether teaming is permitted in attachments).
• Use a subcontractor bench for surge scheduling if the buyer needs multiple audits in a tight window (verify constraints in attachments).
• If the buyer requires specific local access or facility familiarity, consider teaming with a firm experienced with federal aviation environments (verify relevance in attachments).

Risks & watch-outs (bullets)

• No public description: scope and evaluation criteria likely live in attachments; bidding blind is a common trap.
• Short response window: ensure you can meet submission requirements without cutting corners on compliance.
• Accreditation/eligibility risk: registrar status and any required accreditations may be mandatory—verify in attachments.
• Hidden site/logistics complexity: multi-site scheduling, onsite access, and reporting timelines can inflate effort if not clarified early.
• Set-aside is listed as NONE: plan for full-and-open competitive pressure.

Related opportunities

• Space Data Network (SDN) Mission Operations Center (MOC)
• 53--NUT,SELF-LOCKING,PL
• Temporary Restroom Trailer at Ohmsett *SOLE SOURCE*

How to act on this

1. Open the notice and immediately download/inspect all attachments for scope, sites, and audit cycle details.
2. Confirm you can serve as the registrar for both ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 under the buyer’s required terms (verify in attachments).
3. Draft a compliant, attachment-mapped response outline before writing narrative—then fill in only what is requested.
4. Build pricing from confirmed audit units (sites/audit events/days) and document every assumption.

If you want a compliance-focused review of the solicitation package and a bid/no-bid recommendation under the time crunch, engage Federal Bid Partners LLC to help you triage requirements, shape a low-risk response, and avoid avoidable compliance misses.